H5P activities list



ID Title Activity type View
1M1-1-Before-more-inclusive-approach-to-tort-lawMultiple Choice
3M1-2-Follows-Davison-Note4-2Multiple Choice
7M2-3-Follows-Variations in Mental State-Par2-2Multiple Choice
8M2-3-Follows-Variations in Mental State-Par2-3Multiple Choice
9M2-3-Follows-Classmate’s Kick Hypothetical-Note3-1Multiple Choice
11M2-3-Follows-Fisher v. Carrousel Motor Hotel-Note3-1Multiple Choice
13M2-5-Follows-Banks v. Fritsch-Note2-1Multiple Choice
15M2-5-Follows-Banks v. Fritsch-Note2-3Multiple Choice
16M2-8-Follows-O’Brien v. Cunard-Note5Multiple Choice
20M5-4-Follows-Greenman v. Yuba-Note4-2Multiple Choice
22M5-6-Follows-Shinedling v. Sunbeam-Note5Multiple Choice
27M2-1-Follows-Rules vs. Standards-Par1Multiple Choice
28M2-3-Follows-Variations in Mental State-Par2-1Multiple Choice
29M2-3-Follows-Fisher v. Carrousel Motor Hotel-Note3-2Multiple Choice
30M2-5-Follows-Banks v. Fritsch-Note2-2Multiple Choice
31M2-11-Follows-Vincent v. Lake Erie-Note3Multiple Choice
32M5-4-Follows-Greenman v. Yuba-Note4-1Multiple Choice
33M5-5-Follows-Ford Motor Co. v. Ledesma-Note3Multiple Choice
34M2-3-Follows-Classmate’s Kick Hypothetical-Note3-2Dialog Cards
35M2-5-Follows-Spicer v. Patnode-Note3Dialog Cards
36M5-6-Follows-Ford Motor Company v. Trejo-Note3Dialog Cards
37M5-6-Follows-Shinedling v. Sunbeam Products-Note5-2Dialog Cards
38M6-1-Follows-Kemezy v. Peters-Note5-1Multiple Choice
39M6-1-Follows-Kemezy v. Peters-Note5-2Multiple Choice
40M6-3-Follows-Anne Arundel County v. Reeves-Note3Dialog Cards
41M7-1-Follows-Federal Credit, Inc. v. Greg Fuller-Note3-1Multiple Choice
42M7-1-Follows-Federal Credit, Inc. v. Greg Fuller-Note3-2Multiple Choice
43M7-3-Follows-Chicago Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights, Inc. v. Craigslist-Note3-1Multiple Choice
44M7-3-Follows-Chicago Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights, Inc. v. Craigslist-Note3-2Multiple Choice
45M7-3-Follows-Chicago Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights, Inc. v. Craigslist-Note3-3Multiple Choice
46M4-1-Follows-Scroggs v. Coast Community College Dist.-Note3Multiple Choice
47M4-1-Follows-Haugh v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.-Note3Multiple Choice
48M4-1-Follows-Rodriguez v City of New York-Note3-1Multiple Choice
49M4-1-Follows-Rodriguez v City of New York-Note3-2Multiple Choice
50M4-1-Follows-Rodriguez v City of New York-Note3-3Multiple Choice
51M4-2-Follows-Duvall v. County of Kitsap-Note6Multiple Choice
52M4-2-Follows-George v. U.S.-Note4-1Multiple Choice
53M4-2-Follows-George v. U.S.-Note4-2Multiple Choice
54M4-2-Follows-Riss v. City of New York-Note4Multiple Choice
55M3-Intro-Before-Negligence:DutyDialog Cards
56M3-1-Follows-Duties By Type of Actor and Type of HarmDialog Cards
57M3-2-Follows-Walls v. Oxford Management-Note2Dialog Cards
58M3-2-Follows-Taco Bell Injury HypotheticalMultiple Choice
59M3-2-Follows-Modern ApproachDialog Cards
60M3-2-Follows-Summary of Types of Duty-1Multiple Choice
61M3-2-Follows-Summary of Types of Duty-2Multiple Choice
62M3-2-Follows-Summary of Types of Duty-3Multiple Choice
63M3-2-Follows-Summary of Types of Duty-4Multiple Choice
64M3-3-Follows-Blyth v. Birmingham Waterworks Co.-Note3Dialog Cards
66M3-3-Follows-Lifson v. City of Syracuse-Note5-1Multiple Choice
67M3-3-Follows-Lifson v. City of Syracuse-Note5-2Multiple Choice
68M3-2-Follows-Palsgraf v. Long Island-Note3-1Multiple Choice
69M3-2-Follows-Doctrinal Synthesis-1Multiple Choice
70M3-3-Follows-Robinson v. Lindsay-Note6Multiple Choice
71M3-4-Follows-Alvarado v. Sersch-Note3-1Multiple Choice
72M3-4-Follows-Alvarado v. Sersch-Note3-2Dialog Cards
73M3-4-Follows-Alvarado v. Sersch-Note3-3Multiple Choice
74M3-4-Follows-Alvarado v. Sersch-Note3-4Dialog Cards
75M3-4-Follows-Note 5. Dangerous Methods of OperationDialog Cards
76M3-6-Follows-Smith v. Cutter Biological, Inc.-Note4Dialog Cards
77M3-8-Follows-Zokhrabov v. Park-Socratic Script-1Multiple Choice
78M3-8-Follows-Zokhrabov v. Park-Socratic Script-2Dialog Cards
79M3-8-Follows-Zokhrabov v. Park-Socratic Script-3Multiple Choice
80M3-8-Follows-Zokhrabov v. Park-Socratic Script-4Multiple Choice
81M3-8-Follows-Chacko v. Com., Dept. of Transp-Note3-1Multiple Choice
82M3-8-Follows-Chacko v. Com., Dept. of Transp-Note3-2Multiple Choice
83M3-8-Follows-Chacko v. Com., Dept. of Transp-Note3-3Multiple Choice
84M1-2-Follows-Davison-Note4-1Multiple Choice
86M1-3-Follows-Garcia v. Halsett-Note3Multiple Choice
87M1-2-Follows-Bartlett-Note3Accordion
88M1-3-Follows-Foster v. Preston Mill-Note3-1Multiple Choice
89M1-3-Follows-Foster v. Preston Mill-Note3-2Accordion
90M1-4-Follows-Toms v. Calvary-Note4-1Dialog Cards
91M1-4-Follows-Toms v. Calvary-Note4-2Multiple Choice
92M1-5-Follows-Guille v. Swan-Note4-1Multiple Choice
93M1-5-Follows-Guille v. Swan-Note4-2Multiple Choice
94M1-5-Follows-Guille v. Swan-Note4-3Multiple Choice
96M1-5-Before-Mulloy v. Sang-1Multiple Choice
97M1-5-Before-Mulloy v. Sang-2Multiple Choice
98M1-5-Before-Gulf v. LutherMultiple Choice
99M1-5-Before-Ruiz v. BertolottiMultiple Choice
100M6-3-Follows-Anne Arundel County v. Reeves-Note3-1Accordion
101M6-3-Follows-Anne Arundel County v. Reeves-Note3-2Accordion
102M6-3-Follows-Anne Arundel County v. Reeves-Note3-3Accordion
103M6-3-Follows-Anne Arundel County v. Reeves-Note3-4Accordion
104M6-3-Follows-Anne Arundel County v. Reeves-Note3-5Accordion
105M6-3-Follows-Anne Arundel County v. Reeves-Note3-6Accordion
106M6-3-Follows-Anne Arundel County v. Reeves-Note3-7Accordion
107M1-3-Follows-Foster v. Preston Mill-Note3-3Multiple Choice
108M1-4-Follows-Toms v. Calvary-Note4-1-1Accordion
109M1-4-Follows-Toms v. Calvary-Note4-1-2Accordion
110M1-4-Follows-Toms v. Calvary-Note4-1-3Accordion
111M1-4-Follows-Toms v. Calvary-Note4-1-4Accordion
112M1-5-Before-Intentional Torts vs Negligence (Socratic Script)Multiple Choice
113M1-6-Follows-Cobbs v. Grant-Note3-1-1Accordion
114M1-6-Follows-Cobbs v. Grant-Note3-1-2Accordion
115M1-6-Follows-Cobbs v. Grant-Note3-1-3Accordion
116M1-6-Follows-Cobbs v. Grant-Note3-1-4Accordion
117M1-6-Follows-Cobbs v. Grant-Note3-1-5Accordion
118M1-6-Follows-Cobbs v. Grant-Note3-2Multiple Choice
119M2-5-Follows-Spicer v. Patnode-Note3-1Accordion
120M2-5-Follows-Spicer v. Patnode-Note3-2Accordion
121M2-5-Follows-Spicer v. Patnode-Note3-3Accordion
122M2-5-Follows-Spicer v. Patnode-Note3-4Accordion
123M2-5-Follows-Spicer v. Patnode-Note3-5Accordion
124M5-6-Follows-Ford Motor Company v. Trejo-Note3-1Accordion
125M5-6-Follows-Ford Motor Company v. Trejo-Note3-2Accordion
126M5-6-Follows-Ford Motor Company v. Trejo-Note3-3Accordion
127M5-6-Follows-Ford Motor Company v. Trejo-Note3-4Accordion
128M5-6-Follows-Ford Motor Company v. Trejo-Note3-5Accordion
129M5-6-Follows-Ford Motor Company v. Trejo-Note3-6Accordion
130M5-6-Follows-Ford Motor Company v. Trejo-Note3-7Accordion
131M3-2-Follows-Walls v. Oxford Management-Note2-1Accordion
132M3-2-Follows-Walls v. Oxford Management-Note2-2Accordion
133M3-2-Follows-Walls v. Oxford Management-Note2-3Accordion
134M3-2-Follows-Walls v. Oxford Management-Note2-4Accordion
135M3-2-Follows-Walls v. Oxford Management-Note2-5Accordion
136M3-3-Follows-Blyth v. Birmingham Waterworks Co.-Note3Accordion
137M3-4-Follows-Alvarado v. Sersch-Note3-2-1Accordion
138M3-4-Follows-Alvarado v. Sersch-Note3-2-2Accordion
139M3-4-Follows-Alvarado v. Sersch-Note3-2-3Accordion
140M3-4-Follows-Alvarado v. Sersch-Note3-4-1Accordion
141M3-4-Follows-Alvarado v. Sersch-Note3-4-2Accordion
142M3-4-Follows-Alvarado v. Sersch-Note3-4-3Accordion
143M3-4-Follows-Dangerous Methods of Operation-1Accordion
144M3-4-Follows-Dangerous Methods of Operation-2Accordion
145M3-4-Follows-Dangerous Methods of Operation-3Accordion
146M3-8-Follows-Zokhrabov v. Park-Socratic Script-2Accordion
147M3-2-Follows-Palsgraf v. Long Island-Note3-2Multiple Choice
148M3-2-Follows-Palsgraf v. Long Island-Note3-3Multiple Choice
149M3-2-Follows-Palsgraf v. Long Island-Note3-4Multiple Choice
150M3-2-Follows-Palsgraf v. Long Island-Note3-5Multiple Choice
151M3-2-Follows-Palsgraf v. Long Island-Note3-6Multiple Choice
152M3-2-Follows-Palsgraf v. Long Island-Note3-7Multiple Choice
153M3-2-Follows-Modern Approach-1Accordion
154M3-2-Follows-Modern Approach-2Accordion
155essay testEssay
156TestMultiple Choice